24-Hour Discrepancy Rocks Karen Read Murder Retrial

Karen Read Murder Retrial: Defense Challenges Key Evidence in Day 19 Cross-Examination The 19th day of Karen Read's murder retrial saw a dramatic turn as the defense grilled digital forensic expert Shanon Burgess. The focus of the intense questioning centered on inconsistencies in Burgess's report, specifically regarding timestamps. The discrepancies, as highlighted by the defense, were substantial, with a potential 24-hour difference between timestamps from the Lexus infotainment system and John O’Keefe’s iPhone data. "These five timelines are not accurate down to the second," the defense attorney stated, pointing out the significant time differences. Burgess, while acknowledging the discrepancies, maintained that the data was still accurate to the second. This statement led to further questioning about the methodology used and the potential impact on the overall case. The defense’s line of questioning aims to cast doubt on the reliability of the digital evidence presented by the prosecution. This development in the trial has significant implications for the case. The accuracy of the timestamps is crucial for establishing a timeline of events and could potentially affect the jury's decision. The ongoing trial continues to captivate the public, highlighting the complexities and challenges of using digital evidence in criminal investigations.