Expert Witness Shakes Karen Read Murder Case with Damning Data Revelation

Karen Read Murder Trial: Expert Testimony Casts Doubt on Collision Theory The trial of Karen Read, accused of second-degree murder in the death of Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, took a significant turn with the testimony of computer forensics expert Matthew DiSogra. DiSogra's testimony focused on data extracted from Read's Lexus, the vehicle allegedly involved in a collision on the day of O'Keefe's death. The expert's analysis revealed a lack of evidence supporting the prosecution's collision theory. "None of the prior events were triggered by a collision," DiSogra stated during his testimony, directly contradicting earlier claims made by the prosecution. His testimony highlighted discrepancies between an initial report and a later amended version, focusing on the methods used to align time data from the vehicle and O'Keefe's phone. DiSogra explained that the initial report used phone call analysis to correct the vehicle's clock, while the amended report shifted to a different methodology. This change raises questions about the accuracy and reliability of the prosecution's evidence. The lack of any recorded impact data on the vehicle's event data recorder further strengthens DiSogra's conclusion. The trial continues, with the defense using DiSogra's testimony to challenge the prosecution's central argument. The outcome remains uncertain, but DiSogra's expert analysis has introduced significant doubt into the collision theory, potentially impacting the jury's deliberations.