Understanding Use Immunity vs. Transactional Immunity: Lessons from the Tory Lanez Trial

The recent trial of Tory Lanez and Megan Thee Stallion has brought renewed focus on the concept of immunity in court. Use immunity, which protects a witness's testimony from being used against them, was granted to Kelsey, a key witness in the case. However, this type of immunity does not necessarily protect the witness from prosecution for other crimes. Transactional immunity, on the other hand, offers complete protection from prosecution. "Use immunity means whatever you say on the stand can't be used against you," explains one legal expert. "However, if the state finds any other evidence, you could be charged for that crime." This distinction highlights the complexities of legal proceedings and the importance of understanding the different types of immunity available to witnesses. The Lanez-Thee Stallion case serves as a critical example of how the nuances of immunity can impact the outcome of a trial. The case underscores the need for clear legal definitions and the importance of legal counsel for witnesses in high-stakes situations.