Mexico's Controversial Popular Vote for Judges: A Risky Reform?

Mexico Holds Historic Judicial Elections Amidst Controversy Mexico held unprecedented elections on June 1st, 2025, where citizens voted for over 2,500 judicial positions, a move intended to increase transparency within the judicial system. However, the reform, promoted by former President López Obrador and supported by current President Claudia Sheinbaum, has sparked considerable debate. Concerns have been raised about the potential for organized crime infiltration and the compromise of judicial independence. "Y que si no sale la ciudadanía a votar, pues obviamente aquellos que tengan la capacidad para movilizar gente por medio de estructuras, pues son quienes van a determinar quién va a terminar el día de mañana en el Poder Judicial," stated César Gutiérrez, a Supreme Court candidate, highlighting the importance of voter turnout. Experts and international organizations, including the UN, warn of the risks associated with this level of public involvement in judicial appointments. The lack of stringent vetting processes has allowed candidates with questionable pasts, including former lawyers for drug traffickers and individuals convicted of serious crimes, to run for office. Tania Ramírez, a lawyer and director of the Dissenting Lawyers Association, points out the absence of crucial background checks: "Tampoco hay requisitos que tengan que ver con ser deudores alimentarios o con estar en un padrón de violencia de género, o etc." This lack of filtering, she argues, has directly impacted the quality of candidates. The elections have also been met with skepticism from many Mexicans. Marta Trejo, a doctor, commented, "Lamentablemente, en México... a veces es por 'dedazo'. Dedazo es cuando la misma gente que está en la política pone a sus familiares o a sus conocidos." This highlights the deep-seated distrust in the system. Despite the controversies, the elections represent a significant step in Mexico's ongoing efforts to reform its judicial system. The outcome will undoubtedly shape the future of the country's legal landscape.