Three-Second Delay: Key Witness Testimony Challenged in Karen Read Trial

The Karen Read trial continues to captivate the public. Today's proceedings focused on a critical point of contention: the accuracy of a defense witness's report. During a tense cross-examination, the lawyer challenged the witness's account of a three-second delay in the vehicle's infotainment system. The lawyer pointed out the witness had paraphrased the report and not directly quoted the relevant section. "You're adding three seconds because of that three-second gap," the lawyer stated, emphasizing the potential for inaccuracy in the witness's analysis. The witness conceded they had not directly quoted the report, highlighting the potential for misinterpretations. The case underscores the critical importance of precise data analysis in legal proceedings and the complexities involved in interpreting technical evidence. The trial continues to unfold, with the outcome still uncertain.