Supreme Court's 'Hunger Games': Expert Warns of Looming Threat to Democracy

Supreme Court's Potential Rollbacks Spark Concerns: Legal Expert Warns of 'Hunger Games' for Democracy The recent overturning of Roe v. Wade has sent shockwaves through the US, prompting anxieties about the future of constitutional rights. University of Michigan law professor Leah Litman, a prominent voice in legal commentary, recently appeared on The Daily Show to discuss these concerns. Litman warns of a potential "Hunger Games" scenario for liberal constitutional democracy, suggesting that the Supreme Court may target other foundational rights and protections. She points to contraception and campaign finance regulations as potential targets for future rollbacks. "So after abortion, I think they are likely to come after contraception," Litman stated. "I think they're likely to come after what remains of the Voting Rights Act." This statement highlights the fear that the current Supreme Court's decisions could lead to a significant erosion of fundamental rights. Litman's analysis emphasizes the potential for widespread consequences if these concerns materialize. Her expertise and the gravity of her warning underscore the importance of ongoing discussions about the future of democratic principles in the United States.