Expert Witness Strengthens Dog Bite Theory in Karen Read Trial

The Karen Read Trial: Expert Reinforces Dog Bite Theory A key witness, Dr. Marie Russell, a retired California physician, recently restated her belief that injuries on John O’Keefe’s arm were caused by a dog attack during the Karen Read trial in Massachusetts. Dr. Russell’s testimony adds another layer of complexity to the case, which has already seen conflicting expert opinions. During her testimony, Dr. Russell clarified that while she initially believed the injuries were consistent with an animal attack, further review of the evidence has solidified her belief that they were specifically dog bites and scratches. She stated, "The more I have reviewed Read's case, the more certain I have become that it was a dog bite and scratch." This statement directly counters other evidence presented in the case. The defense challenged Dr. Russell’s qualifications, questioning her experience in analyzing dog bite wounds. Defense attorney Brennan asked, "You do not have experience over your long, accomplished career in the effort of pattern recognition analysis of dog bite wounds. Isn't that fair to say?" Dr. Russell acknowledged this lack of specific expertise. The trial continues. The conflicting expert opinions highlight the challenges in forensic analysis and the importance of thorough investigation in such cases.