Se deja un pastón en demandar a un compra-venta y le arreglan el coche por 150 …
El abogado Borja Goodman ha relatado en sus redes sociales un caso que, segú
Madrid, Spain A recent legal case has brought to light significant concerns regarding diagnostic accuracy and consumer protection within the automotive repair industry. An individual who purchased a used vehicle subsequently discovered severe engine problems. Following an assessment by an official workshop and an initial expert, the car owner was advised that a complete engine replacement was necessary, prompting a lawsuit against the car seller for contract rescission. However, during the ongoing legal proceedings, a new independent expert was appointed to evaluate the vehicle. This second assessment revealed a starkly different reality: the car's issues were minor, requiring repairs estimated at merely 150. The discrepancy has sparked a debate on the reliability of official workshop diagnoses and the accountability of automotive experts. Borja Goodman, an automotive lawyer, commented on the case, stating, 'It is truly concerning when both an official workshop and an expert can so drastically misdiagnose a vehicle, leading to unnecessary financial and legal burdens for the consumer.' He further questioned the role of experts who seemingly rubber-stamp workshop opinions without thorough independent verification. The case underscores the critical need for robust oversight and transparent practices in vehicle inspections and repairs to protect consumers from potentially fraudulent or incompetent assessments.
El abogado Borja Goodman ha relatado en sus redes sociales un caso que, segú
