Defense Demands Mistrial in Karen Read Case: DNA Evidence Introduced Unexpectedly

The Karen Read trial took another dramatic turn today when defense attorney Robert Alessi moved for a mistrial. Alessi argued that the prosecution's introduction of DNA evidence, a topic not previously raised, was intentionally prejudicial. "The prosecution has intentionally brought up DNA," Alessi stated, "and this has irrevocably tainted the jury's perception of the case." The defense claims this constitutes a violation of Read's right to a fair trial. The prosecution's response and the judge's decision are pending. This unexpected development underscores the complexities and high stakes of the ongoing trial. The court's decision will determine whether the trial will continue or be restarted.