Defense Demands Mistrial in Karen Read Case: Prosecution's DNA Surprise

The Karen Read trial took a dramatic turn on Day 26 in a Massachusetts courtroom. The defense attorney made a motion for a mistrial with prejudice, arguing that the prosecution's unexpected mention of DNA evidence, never previously raised, unfairly prejudiced the jury. "The prosecution's intentional mention of DNA is irremediable," the attorney stated, emphasizing the inability to undo the impact on the jury's deliberations. The defense highlighted the prosecution's strategic decision not to present this evidence earlier, suggesting a deliberate attempt to influence the outcome. This unexpected development raises questions about the fairness of the trial and the prosecution's conduct. The judge's decision on the mistrial motion remains pending, leaving the future of the trial uncertain. This case underscores the importance of proper legal procedure and the potential consequences of strategic maneuvers in high-stakes trials.